 | Fiscal Note2nd Sub. H.B. 429 (Gray) 2026 General Session Special Districts Amendments by Pierucci, Candice B. (McCay, Daniel) |  |
| Ongoing | One-time | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net GF/ITF/USF (rev.-exp.) | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Revenues | FY2026 | FY2027 | FY2028 |
| Total Revenues | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Enactment of this legislation likely will not materially impact state revenue.
| Expenditures | FY2026 | FY2027 | FY2028 |
| Total Expenditures | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Enactment of this legislation likely will not materially impact state expenditures.
| FY2026 | FY2027 | FY2028 | |
| Net All Funds (rev-exp) | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Enactment of this legislation could cost a county or municipality an unknown amount of personnel costs that can be absorbed to provide public notice, conduct a hearing, adopt a final resolution, and establish a new service fund for withdrawals from certain special districts. The aggregate amount of these process costs are unknown as legislative bodies have different configurations and frequency of withdrawals is unclear. To the extent that a garbage collection district and a withdrawing entity cannot reach a withdrawal agreement, enactment of this legislation could cost a withdrawing entity up to $20,000 one-time for a feasibility study. Enactment of this legislation could cost a first responder district and a county up to $10,000 each one-time to jointly obtain a feasibility study for the county's proposed withdrawal; therefore, the aggregate cost of a feasibility study could be up to $20,000 one-time.
Enactment of this legislation likely will not result in direct expenditures from tax or fee changes for Utah residents and businesses.
Enactment of this legislation likely will not change the regulatory burden for Utah residents or businesses.
This bill does not create a new program or significantly expand an existing program.